From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grosch v. Tarr

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 18, 1972
453 F.2d 1337 (4th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-1862.

Argued January 7, 1972.

Decided January 18, 1972.

Thomas F. Loflin, III, Durham, N.C. (Loflin, Anderson Loflin, Durham, N.C., on brief), for appellant.

N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (William L. Osteen, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.

Before BRYAN and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges, and YOUNG, District Judge.


The appellant sought declaratory and injunctive relief to require a reopening of his classification after notice of induction by his Selective Service Board. Relief was denied by the District Court on the basis of Section 10(b) of the Selective Service Act of 1967, which prohibits judicial review of the classification of a registrant after the issuance of an order of induction. We affirm. The Courts have, it is true, established certain minor exceptions to the prohibition on judicial review as prescribed by Section 10(b) but the registrant did not bring himself within such exceptions.

See, Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11 (1968) 393 U.S. 233, 89 S.Ct. 414, 21 L.Ed.2d 402; Breen v. Selective Service Local Board (1970) 396 U.S. 460, 90 S.Ct. 661, 24 L.Ed.2d 653, and Grosfeld v. Morris (4th Cir. 1971) 448 F.2d 1004.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Grosch v. Tarr

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 18, 1972
453 F.2d 1337 (4th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Grosch v. Tarr

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM N. GROSCH, APPELLANT v. CURTIS W. TARR, THE NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 1972

Citations

453 F.2d 1337 (4th Cir. 1972)