From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grooms v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 21, 1985
697 S.W.2d 894 (Ark. 1985)

Opinion

Opinion delivered October 21, 1985

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK — GOOD CAUSE TO GRANT. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.

Peter R. Darling, for appellant.

Steve Clark, Att'y Gen., by: Theodore Holder, Asst. Att'y Gen., for appellee.


Petitioner, William R. Grooms, by his attorney, Peter R. Darling, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the seven-month maximum limit for filing the record in this Court. See Rule 5, Ark. R. App. P., Ark. Stat. Ann., Vol. 3A (Repl. 1979).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

PURTLE, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Grooms v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 21, 1985
697 S.W.2d 894 (Ark. 1985)
Case details for

Grooms v. State

Case Details

Full title:William R. GROOMS v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 21, 1985

Citations

697 S.W.2d 894 (Ark. 1985)
697 S.W.2d 894