From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grooms v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 16, 1995
661 So. 2d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-01231.

June 16, 1995.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Hugh D. Hayes, Judge.


Floyd E. Grooms appeals the denial of his motion entitled "Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence" which he stated he was filing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court treated the motion as one brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) and denied relief on the basis that the motion was untimely. Such treatment was in error and we reverse and remand with instructions that the trial court treat the motion as one filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and consider the merits raised therein. See, e.g., Poiteer v. State, 627 So.2d 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Reversed and remanded.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grooms v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 16, 1995
661 So. 2d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Grooms v. State

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD E. GROOMS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 16, 1995

Citations

661 So. 2d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)