Opinion
2012-05-31
Reported below, 73 A.D.3d 1439, 901 N.Y.S.2d 448.
Motion for reargument denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements [ see18 N.Y.3d 374, 940 N.Y.S.2d 518, 963 N.E.2d 1219 (2011)].
2012-05-31
Reported below, 73 A.D.3d 1439, 901 N.Y.S.2d 448.
Motion for reargument denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements [ see18 N.Y.3d 374, 940 N.Y.S.2d 518, 963 N.E.2d 1219 (2011)].
Full title:John GRONSKI et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MONROE, Respondent.
Court:Court of Appeals of New York.
Date published: May 31, 2012
We reject the further contention of Portage and Baldwin in appeal No. 1 that they were not responsible for…
Ramulic v. StateWe reject defendant's contention that the court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing…