From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gronquist v. Nicholas

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Sep 8, 2011
No. C10-5374 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Sep. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. C10-5374 RBL/KLS.

September 8, 2011


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, [Dkt. # 85], and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.
(2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED as to Defendants Clarke, Morgan, Ramsey, Brunson, Blakeman, Pemberton, and Toohey. Plaintiff's federal claims against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Plaintiff's state claims against them are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
(3) Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18) is DENIED on grounds of Eleventh Amendment immunity as to Defendants Department of Corrections and the State of Washington.
(4) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18) is DENIED as to Defendants Nicholas and Annis (as to claims that they failed to timely assist or aid Plaintiff during the attack).
(5) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.


Summaries of

Gronquist v. Nicholas

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Sep 8, 2011
No. C10-5374 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Sep. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Gronquist v. Nicholas

Case Details

Full title:DEREK E. GRONQUIST, Plaintiff, v. FAYE NICHOLAS, HEATHER ANNIS, CC3 PAUL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Sep 8, 2011

Citations

No. C10-5374 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Sep. 8, 2011)

Citing Cases

Athay v. State

However, where a grievance addresses a different topic, is not received by relevant staff, or does not…