Opinion
September 16, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.).
Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The record on appeal before us supports the determination of Special Term. Since this was merely a pendente lite order, no error was committed by Special Term's failure to set forth the factors it considered and reasons for its decision pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) (b) (Chachkes v Chachkes, 107 A.D.2d 786; Belfiglio v Belfiglio, 99 A.D.2d 462). Mollen, P.J., Lazer, Mangano and Rubin, JJ., concur.