From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grogan v. City of Port Arthur Police Dept.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Nov 3, 2022
1:22-CV-00263-MAC-ZJH (E.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-CV-00263-MAC-ZJH

11-03-2022

MICHAEL GROGAN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORT ARTHUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, TML INSURANCE ADJUSTER, and JEFF THOMPSON Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MARCIA A. CRONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 23, 2022, the court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge. On the same day, Plaintiff Michael Grogan filed her Complaint (Doc. No. 1) and Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 2). Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the magistrate judge found that Grogan met the indigence requirements to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. No. 3. As such, the magistrate judge sua sponte dismissed Grogan's complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii). The court has received and considered the report (Doc. No. 3) of the magistrate judge. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 3) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff Michael Grogan's Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is therefore dismissed.


Summaries of

Grogan v. City of Port Arthur Police Dept.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Nov 3, 2022
1:22-CV-00263-MAC-ZJH (E.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Grogan v. City of Port Arthur Police Dept.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL GROGAN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORT ARTHUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, TML…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

1:22-CV-00263-MAC-ZJH (E.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2022)