From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Groeschner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 10, 2021
No. 564-20 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2021)

Opinion

564-20

06-10-2021

John Groeschner & Marie Groeschner Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On February 18, 2020, respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that the petition was not timely filed with respect to a notice of deficiency issued to petitioners for 2017. On March 26, 2020, and May 6, 2020, respondent filed supplements to the motion to dismiss. In respondent's Third Supplement to Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, filed October 1, 2020, respondent seeks to dismiss this case as to petitioner Marie Groeschner on the ground that no notice of deficiency or other notice of determination was issued to petitioner Marie Groeschner for taxable year 2017 that would permit her to invoke the Court's jurisdiction. Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, as supplemented, petitioners failed to do so.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, as supplemented, is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Groeschner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 10, 2021
No. 564-20 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Groeschner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:John Groeschner & Marie Groeschner Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 10, 2021

Citations

No. 564-20 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2021)