From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Groelinger v. Rogers

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 27, 2020
292 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D19-496

04-27-2020

Mathew GROELINGER, as Trustee and Individually, Appellant, v. Dorothy Jean ROGERS; Michael V.E. Skirpan, as Trustee of the Dorothy Rogers Living Trust dated 9/10/2003; Michael V.E. Skirpan, individually; Skirpan Properties, LLC; Cynthia Willey, individually; and John Willey, III, individually, Appellees.

Cynthia A. Myers of Marie A. Mattox, P.A., Tallahassee for Appellant. Brian W. Hoffman and Nathan R. Jurgensen of Carver, Darden, Koretzky, Tessier, Finn, Blossman & Areaux, LLC, Pensacola, for Appellee, Dorothy Jean Rogers.


Cynthia A. Myers of Marie A. Mattox, P.A., Tallahassee for Appellant.

Brian W. Hoffman and Nathan R. Jurgensen of Carver, Darden, Koretzky, Tessier, Finn, Blossman & Areaux, LLC, Pensacola, for Appellee, Dorothy Jean Rogers.

Per Curiam.

The Court has determined, and Appellant has acknowledged, that the appeal must be dismissed because the order on appeal does not constitute an appealable partial final judgment under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). See Jensen v. Whetstine , 985 So. 2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) ("An order is not an appealable partial final order where there is a factual overlap between the pending claims and the claims resolved by the order."). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED .

Ray, C.J., and Makar and Kelsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Groelinger v. Rogers

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 27, 2020
292 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Groelinger v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:MATHEW GROELINGER, as Trustee and Individually, Appellant, v. DOROTHY JEAN…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 27, 2020

Citations

292 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)