From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grodzins v. Novadel-Agene Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Dec 17, 1947
332 Ill. App. 659 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,901. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed December 17, 1947 Released for publication January 9, 1948

HARMLESS AND PREJUDICIAL ERRORS, § 83prejudicial exclusion of evidence. In action for commissions allegedly due plaintiff salesman, where defendant contended he was not given opportunity to offer in evidence in his behalf certain correspondence bearing on issue in case, held that record clearly showed that defendant was prejudiced by being precluded from introducing in evidence documentary proof and further testimony to sustain his defense.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. GEORGE L. QUILICI, Judge, presiding.

Reversed and remanded for new trial. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the October term, 1946.

Frederick A. Lind, for appellant;

I. Roy Ross, of counsel;

no appearance for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed December 17, 1947; released for publication January 9, 1948.


Summaries of

Grodzins v. Novadel-Agene Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Dec 17, 1947
332 Ill. App. 659 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
Case details for

Grodzins v. Novadel-Agene Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Jack Grodzins, Appellee, v. Novadel-Agene Corporation, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District

Date published: Dec 17, 1947

Citations

332 Ill. App. 659 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
76 N.E.2d 342