Opinion
1:23-cv-00605-SEB-CSW
08-06-2024
TAYLOR KAYE GROCE, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT PINKERTON, et al., Defendants.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION HON. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRYSTAL S. WILDEMAN
Crystal S. Wildeman, United States Magistrate Judge
This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Joint Motion for Dismissal. (Dkt. 77). Plaintiff has failed to respond to discovery requests that are long overdue, even after being compelled to respond. (Dkt. 71). Plaintiff also failed to attend the May 21, 2024, Telephonic Status Conference and did not respond to the Court's Show Cause Order. (Dkt. 75). Plaintiff's failure to participate in discovery and prosecute her case has violated the Federal Rules and this Court's orders.
The Court may dismiss an action if a party fails to cooperate in discovery. Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v). “Though a motion to compel usually precedes the imposition of sanctions under Rule 37, one is not always necessary.” Mojapelo v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 748 Fed.Appx. 68, 70 (7th Cir. 2019). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(b) provides that if “the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with [the Rules],” the Court may dismiss the action. “District courts generally have broad authority to dismiss a case for failure to prosecute, and this includes failure to comply with valid orders.” Thomas v. Wardell, 951 F.3d 854, 862 (7th Cir. 2020).
The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS this action be DISMISSED for failure to comply with the rules and this Court's orders, failure to participate in discovery, and for failure to prosecute the case.
SO RECOMMENDED.