From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grizzel v. The State of N.C.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Oct 11, 2023
1:23CV789 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2023)

Opinion

1:23CV789

10-11-2023

NYAMBER GRIZZEL, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent.


ORDER

Loretta C. Biggs United States District Judge

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on September 14, 2023, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 3,4). No objections were filed within the time prescribed by § 636.

The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be construed as a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition or pursuing any remedies in the state courts. Any new petition must be accompanied by either the five-dollar filing fee or a current application to proceed in forma pauperis.


Summaries of

Grizzel v. The State of N.C.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Oct 11, 2023
1:23CV789 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Grizzel v. The State of N.C.

Case Details

Full title:NYAMBER GRIZZEL, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 11, 2023

Citations

1:23CV789 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2023)