From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grissom v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 19, 1988
761 S.W.2d 606 (Ark. 1988)

Opinion

No. RC 88-67

Opinion delivered December 19, 1988

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in the appellate court is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.

Lyons Emerson, by: W. Ray Nickle, for appellant.

No objection.


Appellant, Bobby Ray Grissom, by his attorney, Roy Nickle, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A Copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Grissom v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 19, 1988
761 S.W.2d 606 (Ark. 1988)
Case details for

Grissom v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bobby Ray GRISSOM v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 19, 1988

Citations

761 S.W.2d 606 (Ark. 1988)
761 S.W.2d 606