From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grise v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Connecticut First Judicial District, Hartford, March Term, 1930
Mar 6, 1930
149 A. 213 (Conn. 1930)

Opinion

Argued March 5th, 1930

Decided March 6th, 1930.

ACTION to recover damages to an automobile and for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, brought to the Court of Common Pleas for Hartford County and tried to the court, Molloy, J.; judgment for the plaintiff and appeal by the defendant. No error.

DeLancey S. Pelgrift, for the appellant (defendant).

Kendall M. Pierce, for the appellee (plaintiff).


The appeal, so far as argued, relies upon the claim that the subordinate facts found by the trial court do not justify its conclusion that, "The plaintiff was in the exercise of due care at the time of the accident." As we read the finding we are of the opinion that this appeal is wholly without merit.


Summaries of

Grise v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Connecticut First Judicial District, Hartford, March Term, 1930
Mar 6, 1930
149 A. 213 (Conn. 1930)
Case details for

Grise v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:ARCADE J. GRISE vs. EDWARD L. DUNN

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut First Judicial District, Hartford, March Term, 1930

Date published: Mar 6, 1930

Citations

149 A. 213 (Conn. 1930)
111 Conn. 719