From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimmage v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 25, 1991
575 So. 2d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 89-02315.

February 1, 1991. Rehearing Denied February 25, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Susan F. Schaeffer, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm the defendant's convictions. We also affirm his sentences in all cases except for circuit court case numbers 87-76 and 87-77. In those two cases, which occurred prior to the 1988 amendment to the habitual offender statute, the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant as an habitual offender without first finding that an enhanced sentence was necessary to protect the public. See Smith v. State, 561 So.2d 1281 (Fla.2d DCA 1990). On remand, the trial court may again impose habitual offender sentences if the proper findings are made.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grimmage v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 25, 1991
575 So. 2d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Grimmage v. State

Case Details

Full title:RANDY L. GRIMMAGE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 25, 1991

Citations

575 So. 2d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)