From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimmage v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 26, 2001
802 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-2380

Opinion filed October 26, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P.9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Brandt C. Downey, III, Judge.


Randy L. Grimmage appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Grimmage alleged that he might not qualify to be sentenced as a habitual felony offender. The trial court denied the claim finding that it was not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion. We disagree. However, we affirm because we conclude that Grimmage's claim is facially insufficient since he did not specifically allege that he lacked the requisite qualifying convictions to be sentenced as a habitual felony offender. See, e.g., Lee v. State, 731 So.2d 71 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (holding habitual felony offender sentence is illegal when defendant lacks the required qualifying offenses). This affirmance is without prejudice to Grimmage's right to file a facially sufficient motion, if he is able to do so.

We affirm Grimmage's remaining claims without comment.

Affirmed.

BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Grimmage v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 26, 2001
802 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Grimmage v. State

Case Details

Full title:RANDY L. GRIMMAGE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 26, 2001

Citations

802 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)