suggesting that "mistake or oversight in the initial action" may defeat a presumption of vindictiveness but would not be sufficient once a presumption of vindictiveness arises
Summary of this case from Hood v. StateNo. 83-1054.
February 27, 1984, October TERM, 1983.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 705 F. 2d 179.
suggesting that "mistake or oversight in the initial action" may defeat a presumption of vindictiveness but would not be sufficient once a presumption of vindictiveness arises
Summary of this case from Hood v. StateFull title:GRIMM v. LEINART ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 27, 1984
eyes, 209 Or. 595, 631-32, 303 P.2d 519, 304 P.2d 446, 308 P.2d 182 (1957) (insufficiency of evidence to…
State v. CongerAlthough a defendant may make a constitutional challenge to grand jury proceedings without specific statutory…