From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimes v. Terhune

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 18, 2001
8 F. App'x 683 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


8 Fed.Appx. 683 (9th Cir. 2001) Raymond T. GRIMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.A. TERHUNE; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-56342. D.C. No. CV-99-11421-ABC. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 18, 2001

Submitted April 9, 2001. .

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, and denies Grimes' request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Audrey B. Collins, District Judge, Presiding.

Page 684.

Before CANBY, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Raymond T. Grimes, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants at the California Rehabilitation Center ("CRC") used excessive force against him, and that defendants at the California State Prison ("CSP") committed due process and Eighth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and adopted by the district court on July 10, 2000.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Grimes v. Terhune

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 18, 2001
8 F. App'x 683 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Grimes v. Terhune

Case Details

Full title:Raymond T. GRIMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.A. TERHUNE; et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 18, 2001

Citations

8 F. App'x 683 (9th Cir. 2001)