From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimes v. Hemschoot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 24, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-02131 (D.D.C. Oct. 24, 2016)

Opinion

Case: 1:16-cv-02131

10-24-2016

JEROME L. GRIMES, Plaintiff, v. PETER HEMSCHOOT, et al., Defendants.


Assigned To : Unassigned
Assign. Date : 10/25/2016
Description: Pro Se Gen. Civil (F Deck) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint.

The Court has reviewed plaintiff's complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claims being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

The Court has reviewed the complaint and finds that it fails to meet the standard set forth in Rule 8(a). Between the initial allegation that defendants have employed "illegal terror tools technology," Compl. at 1, and plaintiff's demand for "[a]n injunction confiscating illegal micro video . . . and . . . chip devices, id. at 6, the Court identifies no viable legal claim. Absent a statement of cognizable claims showing plaintiff's entitlement to relief, the complaint must be dismissed. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. DATE: 10/24/2016

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Grimes v. Hemschoot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 24, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-02131 (D.D.C. Oct. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Grimes v. Hemschoot

Case Details

Full title:JEROME L. GRIMES, Plaintiff, v. PETER HEMSCHOOT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2016

Citations

Case: 1:16-cv-02131 (D.D.C. Oct. 24, 2016)