From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grimaldi v. Spievogel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 24, 2002
300 A.D.2d 200 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2666

December 24, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered on or about November 28, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict in defendants' favor, dismissed the complaint in this action to recover for personal injuries pursuant to Labor Law § 200 and § 241(6), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Jon C. Dupee, Jr., for plaintiff-appellant.

Frank V. Kelly Dana K. Palmieri, for defendants-respondents.

Before: TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, ROSENBERGER, FRIEDMAN, MARLOW, JJ.


By withdrawing his motion for mistrial and/or a continuance and specifically choosing to proceed with the trial represented by the same attorney, plaintiff waived any subsequent argument that a mistrial should have been granted. In any event, were the issue properly preserved, we would find it a proper exercise of discretion (see R. Hoe Co., Inc. v. Crown Cork Seal Co., 22 A.D.2d 861, affd 16 N.Y.2d 574) for a court not to accede to a request for a mistrial or continuance made after the completion of jury selection, upon the ground that a party, although represented by the same law firm since the action's commencement some seven years before, had suddenly and without explanation lost confidence in the attorney whose intention to try the matter had been made known to defendants' counsel, and presumably plaintiff, more than a year in advance of the trial.

The trial court's charge sufficiently incorporated plaintiff's factual contentions with respect to his claims based upon Labor Law § 200 and § 241(6).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Grimaldi v. Spievogel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 24, 2002
300 A.D.2d 200 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Grimaldi v. Spievogel

Case Details

Full title:RONALD GRIMALDI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CARL SPIEVOGEL, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 24, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 200 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 737

Citing Cases

Keybank Nat'l. v. Howlett Hill

Because KeyBank's notice of pendency was cancelled by court order, Griswold's reliance on CPLR 6514 (d) is…

In the Mtr. of Metlife Auto Home v. Pennella

A hearing was held to determine the validity of the cancellation, at which the appellant waived live…