From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griggs v. Tulare Dist. Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-CV-00412-OWW-GSA (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-CV-00412-OWW-GSA

09-14-2011

CHRISMA GRIGGS, Plaintiff, v. TULARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL, a public entity, MICHAEL BULLOCK, an individual (as to GC section 12940 only), and CRAIG TANAKA, an individual (as to GC section 12940 only), Defendants. TULARE DISTRICT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM (erroneously sued as TULARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL), a public entity, Cross-Claimant, v. SODEXO AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and CRAIG TANAKA, an individual, Cross-Defendants. SODEXO AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Cross-Claimant, v. TULARE DISTRICT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM (erroneously sued as TULARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL), a public entity, Cross-Defendant.

Dennis G. McCarthy, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Claimant/ Cross-Defendant TULARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL John Hugo, Esq. Attorneys for Cross-Defendant/Cross- Claimant SODEXO AMERICA, LLC


DENNIS G. MCCARTHY, Esq. (Bar No. 118178)

SHARILYN R. PAYNE, Esq. (Bar No. 203700)

FENTON & KELLER

A Professional Corporation

2801 Monterey-Salinas Highway

LEONARD C. HERR, Esq. (Bar No. 81896)

DOOLEY, HERR, PELTZER & RICHARDSON,

LLP

Attorneys for Cross-Claimant/Defendant

TULARE DISTRICT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE; AND ORDER

Date of Filing: March 8, 2010

Trial Date: February 7, 2012

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Chrisma Griggs in propria persona and the other parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action, Chrisma Griggs v. Tulare District Hospital, Michael Bullock, and Craig Tanaka, and the above-captioned cross-actions, Tulare District Healthcare System v. Sodexo America, LLC and Craig Tanaka, and Sodexo America, LLC v. Tulare District Healthcare System, be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).

Each party agrees to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs incurred to date.

_____________________________

Chrisma Griggs, Plaintiff, In Propria Persona

FENTON & KELLER

Dennis G. McCarthy, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Claimant/

Cross-Defendant TULARE DISTRICT

HOSPITAL

COOLEY MANION JONES, LLP

John Hugo, Esq.

Attorneys for Cross-Defendant/Cross

Claimant SODEXO AMERICA, LLC

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE BEING SHOWN as set forth in the stipulation of plaintiff CHRISMA GRIGGS, in propria persona, and counsel for Defendant/Cross-Claimant/ Cross-Defendant TULARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL and for Cross-Defendant/Cross-Claimant SODEXO AMERICA, LLC, the Court adopts the stipulation as an order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Oliver W. Wanger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Griggs v. Tulare Dist. Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-CV-00412-OWW-GSA (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Griggs v. Tulare Dist. Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISMA GRIGGS, Plaintiff, v. TULARE DISTRICT HOSPITAL, a public entity…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 14, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-CV-00412-OWW-GSA (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)