From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
Jun 5, 2018
547 S.W.3d 828 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105488

06-05-2018

Walter GRIFFITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101. FOR RESPONDENT: Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.


FOR APPELLANT: Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Walter Griffith appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Griffith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
Jun 5, 2018
547 S.W.3d 828 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Griffith v. State

Case Details

Full title:Walter GRIFFITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.

Date published: Jun 5, 2018

Citations

547 S.W.3d 828 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)