From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. Progressive Sec. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Jan 29, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-01325 (W.D. La. Jan. 29, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-01325

01-29-2021

KEVAN A. GRIFFITH v. PROGRESSIVE SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA JUDGMENT

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the plaintiff's motion to remand (Rec. Doc. 6) should be denied, consistent with the report and recommendation.

Signed at Lafayette, Louisiana, this 29th day of January, 2021.

/s/_________

ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Griffith v. Progressive Sec. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Jan 29, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-01325 (W.D. La. Jan. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Griffith v. Progressive Sec. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:KEVAN A. GRIFFITH v. PROGRESSIVE SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 29, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-01325 (W.D. La. Jan. 29, 2021)

Citing Cases

Prather v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Under the voluntary-involuntary rule, “if a nondiverse defendant is dismissed as a result of either the…