From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. Meyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 3, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03078-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03078-BNB

04-03-2012

DARLENE GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, v. CARMEN A. MEYER, R.N., LOUIS CABILING, M.D., JUDY BRIZENDINE, H.S.A., DOUG ROBERTS, P.P.M.U., MS. JU. GRAY, H.S.A., JOHN DOE, M.D., MS. TORRES, R.N., and CHEIF [sic] MEDICAL OFFICER, Defendants.


ORDER DRAWING CASE

After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2C, the Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2D.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge.

DATED April 3, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Griffith v. Meyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 3, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03078-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Griffith v. Meyer

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, v. CARMEN A. MEYER, R.N., LOUIS CABILING…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03078-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 3, 2012)