From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. Hofmann

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Aug 24, 2006
Docket No. 2:05-CV-126 (D. Vt. Aug. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Docket No. 2:05-CV-126.

August 24, 2006


ORDER


The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed January 9, 2006. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

The defendants' motion to dismiss (paper 15) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The claims for damages against the defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED. Plaintiff shall be allowed 20 days to amend his complaint with respect to his medication claim, and failure to so amend may result in the dismissal of that claim. If Plaintiff files a timely amendment, the defendants may file additional dispositive motions as appropriate. The defendants' motion to dismiss based upon lack of personal involvement and qualified immunity is DENIED.


Summaries of

Griffith v. Hofmann

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Aug 24, 2006
Docket No. 2:05-CV-126 (D. Vt. Aug. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Griffith v. Hofmann

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT HOFMANN, VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Aug 24, 2006

Citations

Docket No. 2:05-CV-126 (D. Vt. Aug. 24, 2006)

Citing Cases

Ford v. Gusman

However, the court found that the "slight delay" in provision of plaintiff's medication was not deliberately…