From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffith v. Bird

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 8, 2011
410 F. App'x 713 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 09-8093.

Submitted January 12, 2011.

Decided February 8, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00308-GCM).

Joseph Michael Griffith, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Joseph Michael Griffith appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffith v. Bird, No. 3:06-cv-00308-GCM, 2009 WL 3722804 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Griffith v. Bird

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 8, 2011
410 F. App'x 713 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Griffith v. Bird

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Michael GRIFFITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.A. BIRD; Betty Brown…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 8, 2011

Citations

410 F. App'x 713 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Utt v. Brown

Thus, plaintiff failed to establish a RLUIPA, First Amendment, or equal protection violation with respect to…

Tyler v. Lassiter

Rather, the record reflects that defendants were simply following policy established DPS policy stating that…