From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Vincent

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 10, 2024
3:24-cv-211-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-211-DPM

12-10-2024

TONY ANTHONY GRIFFIN ADC #150964 PLAINTIFF v. JOE VINCENT, Sgt, North Central Unit, ADC and WARFIELD, Officer, North Central Unit, ADC DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Griffin sued Sergeant Joe Vincent and Officer Warfield in both their individual and official capacities seeking money damages. Magistrate Judge Ervin has recommended dismissal of the official capacity claims. Griffin has objected to the partial recommendation and has moved for leave to file a second amended complaint.

Griffin's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, Doc. 9, is denied. The proposed second amended complaint is substantively the same as his amended complaint, but includes attachments from a disciplinary hearing and a grievance related to the underlying incident. Griffin appears to be anticipating that Sergeant Vincent and Officer Warfield will argue that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We'll cross that bridge if and when we come to it.

On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Ervin's partial recommendation, Doc. 5, and overrules Griffin's objections, Doc. 7 & 8. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). Griffin's official capacity claims for money damages fail as a matter of law and are dismissed. His individual capacity claims against Sergeant Vincent and Officer Warfield go forward.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Griffin v. Vincent

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 10, 2024
3:24-cv-211-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Griffin v. Vincent

Case Details

Full title:TONY ANTHONY GRIFFIN ADC #150964 PLAINTIFF v. JOE VINCENT, Sgt, North…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 10, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-211-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)