From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. United States

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Nov 7, 2016
No. 15-3027 (8th Cir. Nov. 7, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-3027

11-07-2016

Andre Griffin Petitioner - Appellant v. United States of America Respondent - Appellee


Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha [Unpublished] Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Andre Griffin is serving a 150-month prison term imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. In a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, Griffin claimed, as relevant, that his guilty plea was the product of his counsel's ineffective assistance for failing to investigate whether Griffin qualified as a career offender, because absent such status, his plea agreement was unknowing and involuntary. The district court denied relief upon concluding, in part, that Griffin qualified as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 in light of his prior convictions. The court granted a certificate of appealability, however, on Griffin's claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, Griffin concedes that he had a qualifying "controlled substance offense," but argues that his 2004 California conviction for assault with great bodily injury under Cal. Penal Code § 245(a)(1)--a "wobbler" statute--is not a qualifying felony "crime of violence," and that his counsel was relatedly ineffective for failing to investigate.

The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. --------

Following careful review, see Walker v. United States, 810 F.3d 568, 575 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 2042 (2016), we agree with the district court that Griffin's counsel did not provide ineffective assistance. There is no indication in the record that counsel would have been successful in taking the position that Griffin, who received a sentence of 3 years in prison on his prior assault conviction, was not a career offender within the meaning of the Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1); United States v. Grajeda, 581 F.3d 1186, 1189-90 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Adams, 716 F.3d 1066, 1070 (8th Cir. 2013) (per curiam).

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Griffin v. United States

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Nov 7, 2016
No. 15-3027 (8th Cir. Nov. 7, 2016)
Case details for

Griffin v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Andre Griffin Petitioner - Appellant v. United States of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Nov 7, 2016

Citations

No. 15-3027 (8th Cir. Nov. 7, 2016)