Opinion
Nos. 05-04-01482-CR, 05-04-01483-CR
Opinion issued January 9, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F04-48423-Ku and F04-48385-KU. Affirmed.
Before Justices WHITTINGTON, WRIGHT, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
James Christopher Griffin appeals his convictions for aggravated assault and injury to a child causing serious bodily injury. Punishment was assessed at ten years of confinement in the aggravated assault case, and seventy years of confinement and a $10,000 fine in the injury to a child causing serious bodily injury case. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant filed a pro se response claiming there is an arguable issue because his guilty plea was not voluntary or intelligently made. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, PD-300-04, 2005 WL 3057799 (Tex.Crim.App. Nov. 16, 2005). We affirm the trial court's judgment.