From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 12, 2016
182 So. 3d 894 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–2723.

01-12-2016

Nathaniel GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Rick A. Sichta, Susanne K. Sichta, and Joseph Hamrick, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Rick A. Sichta, Susanne K. Sichta, and Joseph Hamrick, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Griffin v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 12, 2016
182 So. 3d 894 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Griffin v. State

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 12, 2016

Citations

182 So. 3d 894 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)