From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Sam's E., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 27, 2016
Case No. 4: 15CV1160 CDP (E.D. Mo. Jan. 27, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 4: 15CV1160 CDP

01-27-2016

DOROTHY GRIFFIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAM'S EAST, INC., et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF REMAND

On January 20, 2016, I ordered defendants to show cause why plaintiffs' motion to amend should not be granted and this case should not be remanded to state court. In response, defendants have filed an opposition challenging the propriety of joining Laurie Portell as a defendant. However, defendants offer no opposition to the substitution of the John Doe defendants and concede that the proposed addition of these defendants will destroy diversity jurisdiction and result in the remand of this case to state court. Accordingly, for the reasons set out in my January 20, 2016, Memorandum and Order, the motion for leave to amend is granted and this case is remanded to state court. Whether or not Portell is properly joined as a defendant is an issue to be resolved by the state court.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion to amend [22] is granted and this case is remanded to the Circuit Court of St. Louis County , Missouri.

/s/_________

CATHERINE D. PERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 27th day of January, 2016.


Summaries of

Griffin v. Sam's E., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 27, 2016
Case No. 4: 15CV1160 CDP (E.D. Mo. Jan. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Griffin v. Sam's E., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY GRIFFIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAM'S EAST, INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

Case No. 4: 15CV1160 CDP (E.D. Mo. Jan. 27, 2016)