From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Price

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 3, 2021
1:21-cv-01518-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01518-BAM (PC)

11-03-2021

DEXTER LAWRENCE GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON PRICE, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT A NONPRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY THE $402.00 FILING FEE (ECF NO. 8)

ORDER TO CLERK'S OFFICE TO SEND PLAINTIFF IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION FOR A NON-PRISONER

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Dexter Lawrence Griffin (“Plaintiff') is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000).

On October 18, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the appropriate form for non-prisoners or pay the filing fee within thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff's application or filing fee is currently due on or before November 22, 2021.

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for extension of time, filed November 1, 2021. (ECF No. 8.) In his motion, which was apparently filed in six of Plaintiff's pending cases. Plaintiff requests an extension of time. Plaintiff does not specify which deadline he wishes to extend in which case, and states only that he needs additional time “on all of the current Court orders.” Plaintiff does not provide a reason for the requested extension, nor does he request a specific length of extension. (Id.) As the only pending deadline in this action is the deadline for Plaintiff to file his application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court construes the request as a request to extend that deadline.

Having considered the request, Plaintiff has not shown good cause for the requested extension of time. Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b). Plaintiff has not provided an explanation for his request for additional time.

Nevertheless, to provide time for Plaintiff to comply with his obligations, the Court will grant the motion for an extension of time. The Court finds an extension of thirty (30) days is appropriate. This will allow Plaintiff sufficient time to review this order and comply. Any future requests for extension of time must be supported by a showing of good cause, and Plaintiff should specify which deadline he wishes to extend.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 8), is GRANTED;
2. The Clerk's Office shall send to Plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner;
3. Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall submit the completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner, or in the alternative, pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action; and
4. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss this action for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Griffin v. Price

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 3, 2021
1:21-cv-01518-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Griffin v. Price

Case Details

Full title:DEXTER LAWRENCE GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON PRICE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01518-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2021)