From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Martin

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 10, 1986
795 F.2d 22 (4th Cir. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-6581.

Argued June 2, 1986.

Decided July 10, 1986.

Steven H. Goldblatt, Director, Appellate Litigation Clinical Program, Georgetown University Law Center (Samuel Dash, Director, Martha J. Tomich, Appellate Law Fellow, Washington, D.C., Mary Rose Kornreich and Charles Kelly, Student Counsel, on brief), for appellant.

Donald J. Zelenka, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen. (T. Travis Medlock, Atty. Gen., Columbia, S.C., on brief), for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia; C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (CA 3:83-838-2).

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc.


The judgment of the district court denying a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed by an equally divided vote of the Court. In light of the grant of rehearing en banc, the majority and dissenting opinions at the panel level are withdrawn.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Griffin v. Martin

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 10, 1986
795 F.2d 22 (4th Cir. 1986)
Case details for

Griffin v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE GRIFFIN, APPELLANT v. GEORGE N. MARTIN, III, WARDEN; ATTORNEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 10, 1986

Citations

795 F.2d 22 (4th Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

Smart v. Leeke

The most obvious example is Griffin in Griffin v. Martin, 785 F.2d 1172 (4th Cir. 1986), who there received a…