From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Kelso

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 16, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-2525 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-2525 MCE JFM (PC).

September 16, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's September 1, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Griffin v. Kelso

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 16, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-2525 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Griffin v. Kelso

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH A. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. J. CLARK KELSO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-2525 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)