From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 10, 1994
440 S.E.2d 483 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

A93A1858, A93A1859, A93A1860, A93A1861, A93A1862, A93A1863, A93A1864, A93A1865, A93A1866.

DECIDED JANUARY 10, 1994. RECONSIDERATION DENIED JANUARY 27, 1994.

Condemnation. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Robinson.

R. David Botts, for appellants.

Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Don Phillips, Debra H. Bernes, Nancy I. Jordan, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.


The State of Georgia brought these proceedings to condemn approximately $20,000 in cash. The money was seized from the appellants in a gambling raid. The trial court determined that the money should be condemned. These appeals followed. Held:

1. Appellants assert the trial court should have dismissed the condemnation petitions because they recited that the State was proceeding under the controlled substances forfeiture statute (OCGA § 16-13-49), instead of the gambling forfeiture statute (OCGA § 16-12-32). We disagree. The petitions clearly stated that the currency had been used in, or had been intended for use in, a violation of OCGA § 16-12-22, the commercial gambling statute. Thus, construing the petitions so as to do substantial justice, OCGA § 9-11-8 (f), it is clear that each stated a viable claim for the condemnation of currency used in, or intended for use in, unlawful gambling activity. Brown v. Rock, 184 Ga. App. 699 ( 362 S.E.2d 480); OCGA § 16-12-32. See generally State of Ga. v. Walls, 202 Ga. App. 899 ( 415 S.E.2d 921). Besides, the petitions were amended by the gambling evidence introduced at trial. OCGA § 9-11-15 (b).

2. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the State, as we are bound to do, we find the following: Conducting a raid on a private club, the police found electronic slot machines in a part of the club. Entering a "card room," the police observed appellants playing poker at a card table. Chips and money were found in trays on the table. One of the appellants identified another appellant as the "banker" and said that the chips were purchased with cash. Various amounts of money totaling approximately $20,000 were found in appellants' pockets. The amounts of money ranged from a low of $118 to a high of $9,728.

Appellants contend the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment of condemnation. This contention is without merit. "A condemnation proceeding is a civil action wherein the State must meet its burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence. [Cit.]" Bloodworth v. State of Ga., 185 Ga. App. 880 ( 366 S.E.2d 324). The evidence was sufficient to enable the trial court to reasonably infer that the currency seized by the police was "used in, intended for use in, used to facilitate, or derived from or realized through" gambling activity. OCGA § 16-12-32 (b). See generally Izzo v. State, 257 Ga. 109 ( 356 S.E.2d 204); Bloodworth v. State of Ga., supra.

Judgments affirmed. Johnson and Blackburn, JJ., concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 10, 1994 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED JANUARY 27, 1994.


Summaries of

Griffin v. Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 10, 1994
440 S.E.2d 483 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Griffin v. Georgia

Case Details

Full title:GRIFFIN v. STATE OF GEORGIA. BLACKSTOCK v. STATE OF GEORGIA. SCHWARTZ v…

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 10, 1994

Citations

440 S.E.2d 483 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)
440 S.E.2d 483

Citing Cases

Woods v. Dept. of Transp

But § 9-15-14 applies "in any civil action," and a condemnation proceeding is a civil action. Griffin v.…

Mayes v. State

Here, the evidence was sufficient to enable the trial court to find that the property seized was contraband…