From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Furlong

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 30, 2006
Civil Action No. 01-N-2168 (MJW) (D. Colo. Jan. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 01-N-2168 (MJW).

January 30, 2006


ORDER


The motion to stay pending exhaustion (#27) does not make sense. The case has already been dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Whether the one-year statute of limitations contained in ADEPA has run is an issue which is premature. It is therefore

ORDERED that the motion to stay be DENIED.


Summaries of

Griffin v. Furlong

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 30, 2006
Civil Action No. 01-N-2168 (MJW) (D. Colo. Jan. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Griffin v. Furlong

Case Details

Full title:CAREY A. GRIFFIN, Applicant, v. MR. ROBERT FURLONG, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 30, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 01-N-2168 (MJW) (D. Colo. Jan. 30, 2006)