From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin v. Caldwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2016
No. 1:11-cv-00210-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2016)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cv-00210-DAD-BAM

03-29-2016

MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. S. CALDWELL, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(Doc Nos. 46, 60)

Plaintiff Matthew James Griffin is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in the civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983.

The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 15, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on the parties and contained notice that objections were to be filed within fourteen days. (Doc. No. 60.) No filed objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /////

Accordingly,

1. The January 15, 2016 findings and recommendations (Doc No. 60) are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Doc. No. 46) is denied; and

3. Defendant shall file an answer within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29 , 2016

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Griffin v. Caldwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2016
No. 1:11-cv-00210-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Griffin v. Caldwell

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. S. CALDWELL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2016

Citations

No. 1:11-cv-00210-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2016)