Opinion
6:24-cv-1432-PGB-LHP
11-01-2024
DATHAN A. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. LUIS F. CALDERON, MICHAEL MURPHY, ERIC J. NETCHER, JEFFREY L. ASHTON, STATE OF FLORIDA, JONATHAN J.A. PAUL, WEISSMAN PAUL, PLLC, THE CITY OF ORLANDO, CHRISTINE PEARSON, JENNIFER ELIZABETH KASCH and ZACHARY J. OXLEY, Defendants
ORDER
LESLIE HOFFMAN PRICE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:
MOTION: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE
SERVICE OF PROCESS (Doc. No. 94)
FILED: October 29, 2024
THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice.
The motion fails to comply with Local Rule 3.01(g) as it does not contain a certification that Plaintiff has conferred with the opposing parties prior to filing the motion. Plaintiff is reminded that despite his pro se status, he is expected to fully comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of this Court, as well as all Orders entered in this case to date. See Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989) (a pro se litigant “is subject to the relevant law and rules of court, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989).