From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Griffin-Robinson v. Salou

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 8, 2021
20cv02712 (PAE) (DF) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2021)

Opinion

20cv02712 (PAE) (DF)

02-08-2021

SONJA R. GRIFFIN-ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY SALOU, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF SERVICE

DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge :

Currently before this Court in the above-captioned action is a request by pro se plaintiff Sonja R. Griffin-Robison ("Plaintiff"), for assistance in effecting service of process on four of the named Defendants in case - specifically Sergeant Darwin Marrero, Police Officer Marilin Peralta, Police Office Jacquelynn Opirhory, and Police Officer Richard DiDonato. (See Dkt. 33; see also Dkt. 31.) As Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed in this action in forma pauperis, she is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. See Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 (2d Cir. 2013); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). Here, the Marshals Service previously attempted to serve each of the Defendants with process, but service could not be effected on the four identified individuals (see Dkts. 24, 25, 26, 29), apparently because they could not be located at the addresses that had previously been provided.

Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires service of the summons and complaint to be completed within 90 days of the date the summons issues, and it is Plaintiff's responsibility to request, if necessary, an extension of time for service. Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012). In this instance, this Court finds that Plaintiff has acted with diligence to follow-up on service issues and to request additional time. (See Dkts. 30, 33.) Further, counsel for the City of New York has now provided new addresses for each of the four defendants who still need to be served, so that the Marshals Service should now be able to effect service. (See Dkt. 31.)

To allow Plaintiff to effect service on defendants Marrero, Peralta, Opirhory, and DiDonato through the Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a new U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form ("USM-285 form") for each of these defendants, with the addresses that have now been provided to the Court. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons and deliver to the Marshals Service all of the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon these particular defendants. Dated: February 8, 2021

New York, New York

SO ORDERED

/s/_________

DEBRA FREEMAN

United States Magistrate Judge

Copies to

Plaintiff (via ECF) All counsel (via ECF)

DEFENDANTS TO BE SERVED, AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

1. Sergeant Darwin Marrero:

25th Precinct

120 East 119th Street

New York, NY 10035

2. Police Officer Marilin Peralta

20th Precinct

120 West 82nd Street

New York, NY 10024

3. Police Officer Jacquelynn Opirhory

Candidate Assessment Division

235 East 20th Street

New York, NY 10003

4. Police Officer Richard DiDonato

Police Laboratory, Firearms Analysis Section

150-14 Jamaica Avenue

Jamaica, NY 11432


Summaries of

Griffin-Robinson v. Salou

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 8, 2021
20cv02712 (PAE) (DF) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Griffin-Robinson v. Salou

Case Details

Full title:SONJA R. GRIFFIN-ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY SALOU, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 8, 2021

Citations

20cv02712 (PAE) (DF) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2021)