From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grievance Comm. for the Tenth Judicial Dist. v. Princivil (In re Princivil)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 25, 2020
183 A.D.3d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2019–09706

03-25-2020

In the MATTER OF Rony PRINCIVIL, a Suspended Attorney. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner; v. Rony Princivil, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 2864288)

Catherine A. Sheridan, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Nancy B. Gabriel of counsel), for petitioner.


Catherine A. Sheridan, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Nancy B. Gabriel of counsel), for petitioner.

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, MARK C. DILLON, RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ.

OPINION & ORDER

PER CURIAM. On August 8, 2019, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District personally served the respondent with a notice of petition and a verified petition, both dated July 31, 2019, and duly filed those papers with this Court together with an affidavit of service. The verified petition contains six charges of professional misconduct, which allege, inter alia, that the respondent, a suspended attorney, practiced law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction, failed to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in an investigation of two sua sponte complaints of professional misconduct, and failed to re-register as an attorney with the Office of Court Administration for three consecutive registration periods. The notice of petition directed the respondent to serve and file his answer to the verified petition within 20 days after service upon him of the verified petition. To date, the respondent has neither served nor filed an answer to the verified petition, as directed, nor requested additional time in which to do so.

The Grievance Committee moves to deem the charges against the respondent established based upon his default and to impose such discipline upon him as this Court deems appropriate. Although the motion papers were served by the Grievance Committee, by mail, upon the respondent on September 4, 2019, he has neither opposed the motion nor interposed any other response thereto.

Accordingly, the Grievance Committee's motion to deem the charges in the verified petition dated July 31, 2019, established is granted, the charges in the verified petition are deemed established, and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

ORDERED that the Grievance Committee's motion to deem the charges in the verified petition dated July 31, 2019, established is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Rony Princivil, a suspended attorney, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent, Rony Princivil, shall continue to comply with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred or suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 1240.15 ); and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Rony Princivil, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,

ORDERED that if the respondent, Rony Princivil, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency, and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.15(f).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grievance Comm. for the Tenth Judicial Dist. v. Princivil (In re Princivil)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 25, 2020
183 A.D.3d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Grievance Comm. for the Tenth Judicial Dist. v. Princivil (In re Princivil)

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Rony PRINCIVIL, a Suspended Attorney. Grievance Committee…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 25, 2020

Citations

183 A.D.3d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
119 N.Y.S.3d 907