From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grievance Administrator v. Scharg

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 5, 2000
463 Mich. 1218 (Mich. 2000)

Opinion

No. 116136.

December 5, 2000.


ADB: 97-191-GA

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, this case is remanded to the Attorney Discipline Board for further consideration. MCR 9.122(E). The Attorney Discipline Board shall consider whether respondent violated MCR 2.114(D) by signing a brief and affidavit filed in the Court of Appeals without having read the documents, and, if so, whether the violation of MCR 2.114(D) constituted misconduct under MCR 9.104. If the Attorney Discipline Board finds misconduct, it shall determine the appropriate discipline and enter an order of discipline. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Cavanagh and Kelly, JJ,. would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Grievance Administrator v. Scharg

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 5, 2000
463 Mich. 1218 (Mich. 2000)
Case details for

Grievance Administrator v. Scharg

Case Details

Full title:GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, STATE OF MICHIGAN…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 5, 2000

Citations

463 Mich. 1218 (Mich. 2000)
620 N.W.2d 849