Griego v. State

5 Citing cases

  1. Henderson v. State

    No. 12-11-00231-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2011)   Cited 2 times

    In sum, a rational jury could have concluded that Officer Vickers made a show of authority and that Appellant refused to yield to it. Griego v. State, 331 S. W.3d 815, 828 (Tex. App.-Amarillo) (op. on reh'g), vacated on other grounds, 337 S.W.3d 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (per curiam). With regard to Appellant's haste in making his way to the apartment, the evidence shows, when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, that Appellant did more than "walk" or "proceed" to the apartment.

  2. Henderson v. State

    Nos. 12-09-00399-CR, 12-09-00400-CR (Tex. App. May. 31, 2011)   Cited 3 times

    In sum, a rational jury could have concluded that Officer Waldon made a show of authority and that Appellant refused to yield to it. Griego v.State, 331 S.W.3d 815, 828 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 2011) (op. on reh'g), vacated on other grounds, No. PD-1226-10, 2011 WL 1662378 (Tex. Crim. App. May 4, 2011) (per curiam). The remaining question is whether Officer Waldon's attempted detention of Appellant was lawful.

  3. Griego v. State

    337 S.W.3d 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011)   Cited 41 times

    On January 11, 2011, the Court of Appeals issued another opinion and reformed the conviction to reflect that Appellant was guilty of the class B misdemeanor offense of evading arrest or detention. Griego v. State, 331 S.W.3d 815 (Tex.App.-Amarillo, No. 07-09-00206-CR, delivered January 11, 2011). The Court of Appeals's opinion issued on January 11, 2011, was untimely under rule 50 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it was issued more than 60 days after the State's petition for discretionary review had been filed.

  4. Acosta v. State

    No. 04-10-00741-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2011)

    We note that Sunkist and Callaghan do not intersect, but Sunkist intersects with Mira Vista, which turns into Seacroft Street before intersecting with Callaghan. See Griego v. State, 331 S.W.3d 815, 820 (Tex. App.— Amarillo) (noting that appellate courts may take judicial notice of location of streets and other geographical facts), vacated on other grounds, 337 S.W.3d 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). After Acosta told Officer Diaz that he did not have a driver's license, she returned to her patrol car to run Acosta's information. Within about two minutes, San Antonio Police Officers Javier Perales, Jr. and Daniel Lopez drove up to the scene.

  5. Griego v. State

    345 S.W.3d 742 (Tex. App. 2011)   Cited 51 times
    Holding that a defendant's speed and the duration of the pursuit may show a defendant's intent to evade arrest

    After having considered the supplemental briefing, we ultimately concluded that appellant's factual sufficiency contentions regarding the state jail felony on original submission raised the sufficiency of the evidence under Brooks and reviewed those contentions and the record under the standard outlined in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). See Griego v. State, 331 S.W.3d 815, 819 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2010), vacated on other grounds, 337 S.W.3d 902 (Tex.Crim.App. 2011) (per curiam). As the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals noted in vacating our judgment so concluding, we exceeded Rule 50's sixty-day period in which to issue that opinion and were without jurisdiction to do so.