Opinion
No. 13-6568
06-27-2014
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 14a0466n.06
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
BEFORE: SUTTON and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and SARGUS, District Judge.
The Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM.
Kimberly Grice appeals the district court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. We review the district court's determination de novo. See Keith v. Cnty. of Oakland, 703 F.3d 918, 923 (6th Cir. 2013).
After carefully reviewing the record, the parties' briefs, and the applicable law, we find no error in the district court's judgment. The reasoning that supports the judgment was clearly and persuasively articulated by the district court, and our issuance of a detailed written opinion would be unduly duplicative and serve no jurisprudential purpose. We therefore affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in that court's opinion. See Grice v. Jackson-Madison Cnty. Gen. Hosp. Dist., 981 F. Supp. 2d 719 (W.D. Tenn. 2013).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.