From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gribble v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 4, 1930
115 Tex. Crim. 90 (Tex. Crim. App. 1930)

Opinion

No. 13326.

Delivered June 4, 1930.

Appeal — Escape — Recapture.

Since, by proper showing, it appears that appellant escaped since the appeal was perfected, the appeal is dismissed, and the fact that appellant was recaptured would not affect the legal question presented.

Appeal from the District Court, McLennan County. Tried below before the Hon. Richard I. Munroe, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for felony theft; penalty, two years in the penitentiary.

The opinion states the case.

H. S. Beard, of Waco, for appellant.

A. A. Dawson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Conviction for felony theft; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The State moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that while the motion for rehearing was pending this appellant made his escape from custody. The motion is accompanied by the affidavit of Leslie Stegall, Sheriff of McLennan county, Texas, in whose custody appellant was at the time, showing that on May 23, 1930, he made his escape from jail by sawing out certain bars and fleeing from said jail. The motion will be granted. The fact that later said prisoner was recaptured does not affect the law of the situation. Laughlin v. State, 97 Tex. Crim. 370; Pendergrass v. State, 92 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Maugia v. State, 90 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Loyd v. State, 19 Texas Crim. App. 137.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Gribble v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 4, 1930
115 Tex. Crim. 90 (Tex. Crim. App. 1930)
Case details for

Gribble v. State

Case Details

Full title:LOIS GRIBBLE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 4, 1930

Citations

115 Tex. Crim. 90 (Tex. Crim. App. 1930)
29 S.W.2d 391