From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grey v. Shaw

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 25, 2010
Criminal Action No. 10-cr-00253-REB (D. Colo. Jun. 25, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 10-cr-00253-REB.

June 25, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the "Rule 4 Motion" filed pro se by Complainant Christopher James Grey on June 24, 2010. Mr. Grey is a prisoner in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections at the Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility in Crowley, Colorado. Mr. Grey initiated this action by filing pro se a Criminal Complaint asking that Defendant be arrested and charged with sexual assault on an at-risk adult in a penal institution. On May 7, 2010, the Court entered an order dismissing the Criminal Complaint and the action because Mr. Grey lacks standing to invoke the authority of United States attorneys under 28 U.S.C. § 547 to prosecute for offenses against the United States.

In the "Rule 4 Motion," Mr. Grey objects to the summary dismissal of this action, and he asks the Court to reconsider that decision. The motion will be denied because Mr. Grey does not even address the basis for the Court's order dismissing this action — that he lacks standing to initiate a criminal action — and the Court remains convinced that this action properly was dismissed based on Mr. Grey's lack of standing. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the "Rule 4 Motion" filed on June 24, 2010, is denied.


Summaries of

Grey v. Shaw

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jun 25, 2010
Criminal Action No. 10-cr-00253-REB (D. Colo. Jun. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Grey v. Shaw

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER JAMES GREY, Complainant, v. TERRY SHAW, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jun 25, 2010

Citations

Criminal Action No. 10-cr-00253-REB (D. Colo. Jun. 25, 2010)