From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greso v. Nichter Construction Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1999
267 A.D.2d 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

December 30, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Summary Judgment.

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint against defendant Ciminelli-Cowper Co., Inc. dismissed.

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., HAYES, SCUDDER AND BALIO, JJ.


Memorandum:

Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by Paul T. Greso (plaintiff) when he fell down a permanent stairway. At the time of his fall, plaintiff was carrying a bolt of wall-covering up the stairway. Supreme Court erred in denying that part of the motion of Ciminelli-Cowper Co., Inc. (defendant) seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 Lab.(1) claim. "Labor Law § 240 Lab. (1) does not apply where plaintiff falls on a permanently installed stairway" ( Monroe v. New York State Elec. Gas Corp., 186 A.D.2d 1019). Speculation that plaintiff could have safely performed his work with the aid of a material hoist does not defeat defendant's entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 Lab.(1) claim ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). The fact remains that the stairway where plaintiff fell "was undisputedly a permanent passageway between two parts of the building, and was not a tool or device employed solely to provide access to an elevated worksite" ( Sponholz v. Benderson Prop. Dev., 266 A.D.2d 815 [decided Nov. 12, 1999]).

The court also erred in denying that part of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 200 Lab. claim and the common-law negligence cause of action. Defendant established that it exercised no supervisory control over the method of plaintiff's work ( see, Comes v. New York State Elec. Gas Corp., 82 N.Y.2d 876, 877; McCune v. Black Riv. Constructors, 225 A.D.2d 1078, 1079), and plaintiffs failed to submit proof raising a triable issue of fact.


Summaries of

Greso v. Nichter Construction Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1999
267 A.D.2d 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Greso v. Nichter Construction Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL T. GRESO AND NANCY M. GRESO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. NICHTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
700 N.Y.S.2d 348

Citing Cases

Matthewson v. County of Erie

In support of their motion, defendants established that they had no authority to supervise or control…