From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gresham v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 1, 2017
220 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. 2017)

Opinion

No. SC16–359

06-01-2017

Robert N. GRESHAM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa, Florida, for Petitioner Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent


Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa, Florida, for Petitioner

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Gresham v. State , 181 So.3d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

CANADY, J., concurs in result.


Summaries of

Gresham v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 1, 2017
220 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. 2017)
Case details for

Gresham v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT N. GRESHAM, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 1, 2017

Citations

220 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. 2017)