From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grenadier v. Hudson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 10, 2019
No. 18-2071 (4th Cir. Apr. 10, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-2071

04-10-2019

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRY E. HUDSON, US District Court Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond); DONALD J. TRUMP, President; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; VIRGINIA STATE BAR; JOHN AND OR JANE DOE 1-50, Defendants - Appellees.

Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (1:18-cv-00571-MSD) Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2012). --------

Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court's order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. Hudson, No. 1:18-cv-00571-MSD (E.D. Va. July 18, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Grenadier v. Hudson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 10, 2019
No. 18-2071 (4th Cir. Apr. 10, 2019)
Case details for

Grenadier v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRY E. HUDSON, US…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 10, 2019

Citations

No. 18-2071 (4th Cir. Apr. 10, 2019)