Opinion
07-CV-1542 (NGG).
April 4, 2008
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Plaintiff Laurence Gregory brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that Defendant Sondra K. Pardes, a Nassau County District Court Judge, conspired with Christopher G. Quinn, also a Nassau County District Court Judge, and Kathy Doyle, an Assistant District Attorney, to deprive Gregory of his constitutional rights. Gregory claims that (1) Pardes lied when she stated that she could not dismiss Gregory's misdemeanor charge pursuant to New York's speedy-trial law; (2) Pardes failed to correctly follow the provisions of New York's speedy-trial law; (3) Pardes conspired with Doyle to commit fraud upon the court, perjury, obstruction of justice, prosecutorial misconduct, and "default by the people" when she failed to correct Doyle's misrepresentations relating to Gregory's New York speedy-trial rights; and (4) Pardes conspired with Quinn to commit perjury when she falsely characterized rulings made by Quinn relating to Gregory's New York speedy-trial rights. (Complaint (Docket Entry # 1).)
Gregory asks for a new jury trial, that his motion relating to his New York speedy-trial rights be heard by a different judge, that this court declare that Pardes has violated his constitutional rights, that Pardes's rulings not be enforced, and that Pardes be impeached. (Id.)
I. DISCUSSION
II. CONCLUSION
Rooker Feldman Kropelnicki v. Siegel290 F.3d 118129Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp. 544 U.S. 280284Rooker Feldman See Kropelnicki 290 F.3d at 128Gentner v. Shulman55 F.3d 8788
Congress may provide such subject-matter jurisdiction legislatively. See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (providing a remedy in federal courts for a person held in state custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States).
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and therefore the court has construed his complaint liberally. Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9 (1980). Nevertheless, none of his claims give rise to subject-matter jurisdiction in this court.
SO ORDERED.