From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shanafelt v. Hollander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 16, 2015
No. 03:14-cv-01722-ST (D. Or. Apr. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. 03:14-cv-01722-ST

04-16-2015

GREGORY A SHANAFELT, Plaintiff, v. DAVID HOLLANDER, JEFF GERNER, of SAIF CORP., THOMAS SHERIDAN of EMPIRE PACIFIC RISK MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant.


ORDER ,

Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (#49) on March 6, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants' motions to dismiss and dismiss this case with prejudice.

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings & Recommendation [49]. Accordingly, Defendants' motions to dismiss [23, 27] are granted. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [3] is denied as moot. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 16 day of April, 2015.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Shanafelt v. Hollander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 16, 2015
No. 03:14-cv-01722-ST (D. Or. Apr. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Shanafelt v. Hollander

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY A SHANAFELT, Plaintiff, v. DAVID HOLLANDER, JEFF GERNER, of SAIF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 16, 2015

Citations

No. 03:14-cv-01722-ST (D. Or. Apr. 16, 2015)